Monday, November 1, 2010

Preliminary Disclaimer and Advisory

J.M.J.

If the web has taken away
Your ability attention to pay
You need not worry nor have fear;
We’re also on YouTube: just click here.

Note: To view this blog aright click “CTRL +” (to zoom in) and “CTRL –” (to zoom out).

Why  ROMAnce?
Only the common man is equipped to perceive the immense pleasure of orthodoxy.
Preliminary  Disclaimer  &  Advisory
This book has teeth.
by J. P. F. McGuire
    a|   To give you an idea of what you’ve got on your hands this (manu)script has received so far only unqualified praise and unqualified criticism. But if you can get past your feelings and think about what this work contains please email me post-haste with your thoughts. I think I should give you fair warning that if you earned your degree and then stopped thinking you will hate me because you and I are polar opposites. I fancy that tradition and élitism are forever at odds, but I’ll let you know when I’m one hundred percent on that. For me there will always be mysteries, an attitude that for me is what being Catholic (realistic) means, and that openness permeates every word I jot as a matter of both conscience and trained habit. What drives me is mission rather than ambition. Mainly I think this is because we are all going to die, and who knows when? Once you accept that reality nothing else I say can shock you. I do not think I know anything you don’t, common man. I do think I’ve “wasted” more time than does the average Catholic linking facts that at a cursory glance look “disconnected” and maybe “irrelevant,” my hermeneutic being succinctly spiritual freedom. I suffer from Asperger’s Syndrome and have been told I sound condescending when I am merely excited. The reading that follows is not casual reading but it is common reading if you will. It is meant to help you change your life the way you deeply yearn to by challenging all the dangling threads, often including one or two you may have falsely identified yourself with and, one at a time, bringing all things life-giving into crisp perspective.
    b|   This is not a manuscript but simply a script intended to be not a book but a lecture, so ideally I would read it aloud in a forum of about fifty people. If you want to take such a plunge in your parish email me. My theme may be summed up as Teachings that once upon a time inspired people to give up riches, marriage and their lives or simply Doctrines that made saints. That is why naturally my trust of recently convened councils, conferences and conventions as compared with two thousand years of tradition is thin at best, but I do listen most attentively (indeed perhaps too attentively for the liking of some). If you don’t understand why I give the élites such grief then such are my failures as a writer, and there’s an end of it.
    c|   I don’t have an issue with authority, and I refuse to wear the mask of traditionalism. Rather I love and hate all ideologies equally just as I love and hate all races equally. There are those whose agenda hinges on eviscerating the common man so their geopolitical sorcery can work. Every time I hear some talking head or empty suit (or cassock most unfortunately) say the United Nations needs to have “teeth” I ask myself, How can I give the common man teeth for when this inevitably degenerates into tyranny? (Not that I don’t get an ecstatic thrill at the thought of a bankster-run world parliament or anything, don’t get me wrong.) I am not a relativist or an anarchist in the conventional sense (probably because I’m simply not conventional). I neither favor all authority nor oppose all authority because I deem both stances loony and mentally lazy. I am daily more convinced that there is no point that is good in the United States Constitution that will not find its best soul-sister in Catholic doctrine. I care more about man than about humanism, more about God than about theology. I don’t need endless novelty or evolution. I need freedom!
   d|   I do not endorse bombing the United Nations for one simple reason: abolishing one’s mental laziness will do infinitely more good, and good of an “irreparable” sort (so to speak). This book has teeth, and if you let it it will take you to the foot of the cross intellectually. This could be why it has received only unqualified praise and unqualified criticism. Without pretending to grasp the meaning behind the hunger and the distaste, that will be my gauge for now to know whether it’s fulfilling its mission.

Join the Why ROMAnce? Facebook Group and become an accessory to restoring ROMAnce to Catholicism.

A.M.D.G.

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Chapter 6. “With No Strings Attached”

J.M.J.

If the web has taken away
Your ability attention to pay
You need not worry nor have fear;
We’re also on YouTube: just click here.

Note: To view this blog aright click “CTRL +” (to zoom in) and “CTRL –” (to zoom out).

Why  ROMAnce?
Only the common man is equipped to perceive the immense pleasure of orthodoxy.
Chapter  6
“With  No  Strings  Attached”
Still hazy on how Catholics should view politics[1]? Drift no longer.
by J. P. F. McGuire
    a|   I love mexico. Mexico is where my Catholic faith grew a heart, and that heart’s name is “Mary.” I love Our Lady of Guadalupe[2]. Guadalupe is the largest pilgrimage site in the world and a continuous miracle, marvel, wonder that knows no equal in either the arts or the sciences, has confounded all who have investigated it and has accordingly earned its place in the United States Calvinist Establishment Index of Forbidden Book Topics just below “creationism.” I warmly encourage you to look into Our Lady of Guadalupe for your own edification. Sancta.org is the site. I am not going to discuss Her here not for want of material but because others have done a far better job than I could ever hope to equal. Words are cheap. More people just need to learn about this and other signs from God with their accompanying spiritually needed messages so we can combat today’s evils. It is as if God were constantly saying, If you’d just humble yourself and glory in my works instead of your own—which are at best mixed in their moral value—I’m on your side against all who set themselves up as tyrants—both logistically and intellectually.
    b|   The West, once saturated with Holy Faith, is now drunk with ideologies—not direct consequences of democratism or even republicanism please note—and this drunkenness is taking a toll on her heart, Catholicism. Without question conservatism keeps liberalism alive, and liberalism keeps conservatism alive, and together they form a codependent cancer on your culture and mine that stagnates man’s intellect. This is the heart of modern man’s psychological woes some term “emotionalism,” others “narcissism,” others “solipsism,” still others “hubris,” the West’s shameless fixation with feeling. Both “con” and “lib” are how the mentally ill react to each other, each determined to not agree with the other on any point lest God forbid their feelings become tainted by dialogue and objectivity! This is why both are much more familiar with what they oppose than what they promote. That they are dysfunctional there can be no sincere doubt. They are artificial loyalties, viscerally based contrived élitist cults, stealthy weapons of mass-distraction (as all fan clubs[3] are) founded squarely in sentiment, generalities, the observer and self rather than principle, truth, the object and God. So recapping, political party lines exist solely to validate the mental illness that is ideology and keep men enslaved from within aided by addiction to fuzzy feelings.
    c|   To put it crudely the right-left ping-pong paradigm saves on steel bars ’cause dem suckers are pricey! Why cage us up when you can tie us up in endless vain ideologies? Why the need to toy with us when you can have us treating life as a game and games (like politics) as life? Were the Church an inhuman machine and not a family projecting our United States degenerated political two-party system onto her would I suppose be fine and dandy. Had God not become one of us this might just be humanity’s best bet. But knowing the true Christ and the true Church makes slavery to sin, the world, the flesh and the devil simply repugnant and inexcusable to believers. Humanity’s fate was never up to the élites who are always and everywhere the scum of the earth and the enemies of humanity’s progress though they speak of “humanity” and “progress” nonstop. Bl. Mother Teresa observed, “Today it is fashionable to talk about the poor. Unfortunately, it is not fashionable to talk with them,” and Dorothy Day vented, “Our problems stem from our acceptance of this filthy, rotten system.”
   d|   Disclaimer #1. Ideas vs. ideologies. Both conservatism and liberalism were, and will always theoretically remain, good ideas, but when we treat them as political party ideologies they mutated into caricatures of their former/ideal selves losing their connection with the rest of reality, their one-time imagined purpose a society possessed of greater common sense assigned them, their truth, beauty and goodness. In other words they become cults and false gods and ends unto themselves. Politics ruins everything it touches without exception. That is why it ought to be dialed back wherever possible, perhaps especially in a democracy. Ideology is the only religion known to materialist man. Communism and capitalism each address material but conspicuously not spiritual aspects of life, which is why they make ideal subjects for endless pointless bickering rather than edifying conversation. Remember that debate or that State of the Prison address you tried for days to unravel or unwatch? Communism and capitalism at best can be taken as merely partial policies that leave a black hole in the spiritual sector, not accounting for the reality of man’s higher faculties, veering quite enslaving, and this vacuum invites all kinds of demons if Catholics are unwary. The communist and the capitalist are both “men” who first pour cement into the pit and then try to add rocks. Meanwhile distributism and subsidiarity, which address life as a whole leaving no empty corners open for corruption, are left on the dusty shelf. Modern man is at a crossroads: he may return to Christendom’s universalist paradigms or finish his ride on the right-left pendulum “progressing” all the way to total enslavement.
    e|   Disclaimer #2. No, really. I say all this in the full, sober knowledge that there are those, on a good day just a handful, who will blow off my and history’s warnings telling yourselves repeatedly, nervously as you’re taught that the world, the flesh and maybe the devil have all the tools to make our lives “perfect.” “Our problems are man-made; therefore they may be solved by man. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings”[4]. Such is the modernist’s creed. The vast majority believe, or passively accept so as to fit in, this deist’s security blanket. There is a “reason” they do this, though reason has nothing to do with it. It is because we have come to build our lives upon matter, to substitute all spiritual (nonperishable) goods with material (perishable) goods, throwing the Gospel right to the wind. Rather than keep Christmas we buy it, which makes us first euphoric and then miserable. We all know the real reason suicides peak on New Year’s even if we don’t want to admit it to ourselves or each other. Yes, it is an addictive cycle. In place of the confessional we have the psychiatrist’s couch. But what spirits hover there? On Sundays those who still attend Mass wash it down immediately with the bone-cracking gladiators of American football which makes for ideal background music for those wishing to reflect on the Gospel counsels discussed that day and be intimate with Jesus from whose total gift of love they just benefitted—or hopefully benefitted. And even on those rare moments when we step into the church we are usually treated to endless chatterings attempting to explain away the Faith—make that a cardboard cut-out version of the Faith—into Zenothing and to live Richard Rohr’s nightmare of a “cosmic christ” and “emerging church” rather than troubling to delve into the mystery that’s right in front of us. Oh yes, Faith has found its match in materialism. And why is this?
     f|   Contrary to popular blindness materialism has a real religious aspect to it, but it isn’t Christian. Materialism is the counterintuitive arm-twisting of the intellect to fixate exclusively on the material, the technical, the physical, which we’ve become twisted enough to consider “solid” and “real” while regarding the spiritual as “vague” and “dreamy.” From here to deep ecology (earth worship) it’s at best a ten-minute walk. Since any true Christian can tell you that God sustains all things in existence by continuing to think about them, materialism is clearly not a Christian philosophy. Deism would preach that God wound up the universe like a cuckoo clock and left it ticking, and we don’t know when He’ll be back, nor do we see even Him as “spirit” as Jesus affirmed He is. So deism is more akin to materialism than Christianity ever was. Deism and materialism take the spotlight off God and generally off all spiritual matters pertaining to persons, things and events, vainly waving the searchlight around seeking material substitutes. Sound like what you and I are living? So deism, as the “muscle” driving materialism, is the religion that militates against legit religion without quite going to the dingbat fest of denying God’s existence. No philosophy but only a religion can replace a religion in any culture. You’ll note that deism does not deny the existence of the spiritual but only “enlightenedly” encourages us to forget it, to ignore it, to shun it at any cost to reason. The Occult is based on the exaltation of matter above spirit and self above God. No one (credible) denies spirit or God. Deists (read Masons) just try to keep us trained on energy and the universe, which are pseudoscientific concepts within their pathetically small cosmos, their shell of a religion.
    g|   It is useful to note that New Age originates in Masonic terminology referent to the imminent “Age of Aquarius” coming on the heels of the “Age of Pisces.” The concept of Four Bimillennial Ages[5] in the life of man, now being the end of the third, comes, along with most speculative Masonry, from Egyptology. But virtually all ancient sources on the theme give the earth and man a similar age (six thousand years), the only difference being one of interpretation and praxis stemming ostensibly from different attitudes or spirits. There really is a living cabal that detests legitimate hierarchy both ecclesial and civil—not because they are oppressive but just the opposite—and wants you and me to forget our Faith and adopt their Occultism. Furthermore the age-old Serpent wants this and empowers them to work to this end. Yet whereas the Church has hierarchy the Masons have lowerarchy; whereas the Church rules visibly the Masons rule covertly; whereas the Church thrives on and spreads life and light emanating from Jesus the Masons thrive on and spread death and darkness wafting from Lucifer. But look: the particular danger of conservatism is becoming phobic of everything that doesn’t come from a miter rather than being mentally healthy. The healthy thing would be to realize that, though divinely appointed, the bishop is, in one sense, just one man filling just one office. Therefore we ought to esteem what the bishop says as coming from a bishop, what the medic says as coming from a medic, what the master stone-layer says as coming from a master stone-layer. As a case in point, though papal authority is limitless (though much contingent upon the person occupying the chair) papal infallibility ends where faith and morals end. This is another function of common sense lost somewhere in the Enlightenment, exchanged presumably for hubris.
    h|   There is much in which Catholicism and the Occult agree and are both correct. We agree on most everything in terms of matter. We agree on man’s history. We agree on so much pertaining to the interpretation of Scripture it’s almost eerie. Mainly I’ve found today they are sharper—more intellectually Catholic—than we in this sense. This might have to do with that they infiltrate us but we don’t infiltrate them, though if doctrine isn’t taught uncompromisingly and authoritatively soon we may see many of our own joining them and every other novelty out there. We diametrically disagree on questions of man’s truest nature and health, which should come as no surprise since we are coming from totally different places spiritually (where all the action happens). Materialism has thus the effect of quashing any internal spiritual discernment which was erstwhile a built-in mechanism to fend off heretical infiltrators within the Church by the laity. Suddenly the bishop is on his own in debugging the clergy because the laity is suddenly oblivious to the true spiritual point of departure the whole Faith is based on, all the reasoning becomes horizontal, all doctrine becomes arbitrary and optional and abuses become mainstream to the point where an antidoxy starts to congeal in the ensuing mess, “order through chaos” being the Masons’ stated mission. Looks like the Masons understand natural law better than Catholics any more. Nature abhors a vacuum. What a shame we just happily surrendered all skill to evil, for how else can we straight-facedly sum up the appreciable aftermath of the Second Vatican Council? At this stage the small sane remnant finds itself all but naked in the face of the orc armada of “white lies” being sold to parishes side by side with the Gospel. The safeguards that were once in place, such as the Saint Michael prayer prayed after each Mass, a sharp attentiveness to the Fatima Prophecies and vigilance and discipline overall have now been put on the back burner to make room for more “enlightened” man-made, demon-inspired innovations. The visible difference between the Occult and Catholicism is that the Occult utterly depends on Catholicism but Catholicism doesn’t depend on the Occult.
      i|   Catholicism and the Occult agree, for example, on the events at Eden. The only difference is the Occult (Masons) sees the Fall as the Rise, the Serpent (Lucifer) as helping man to evolve to rival his Creator. This is a clue as to their fetish for matriarchy. Catholicism, the Occult and anything else with a clue about unanimous ancient record on man’s origins will agree on the general timeline and events of the past. The Occult praises the succubæ of the days of Noah who mated with men and taught them Occult secrets about the earth’s elements. There are dabblings by God’s servants before He sees fit to put a stop to them and begins to punish them.
      j|   You can go through the Bible point by point and realize there are two sides to all the events, the Bible being almost miraculously balanced and careful to tell things just as they happened heedless of reputations or prestige, that they all denote not simply interesting histories but an unrelenting spiritual conflict, that God’s revelation was in no way “nifty” but necessary to save man from other forces that would have almost certainly dragged him down into the abyss time after time. The Bible is not just some collection of scrolls the Council of Nicæa deemed were technically the most literary or agreed with some dude’s arbitrarily preconceived ideas. The Canon of Scripture was weighed on salvific import and that alone. None of this could have been accomplished except by the authority of Christ Himself and under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. It responded to the need the Lord saw, the mission at hand, and was not a luxury item or a safeguard of doctrine based on any human judgment. The experience of being truly Catholic is one of total rapture, fiat, deactivating not only one’s outward controls but more crucially one’s inward inhibitions. Whether or not the reader understands this he does well to bear in mind that it is the key to the Church’s life in its infinite variety of implications in every time and every culture.
    k|   The Church’s battle is not conservatism vs. liberalism but light vs. darkness. Ecclesial policy flows from doctrine not sentiment, for sentiment is always and everywhere subjective and relative. Inasmuch as it bolsters hubris beyond what the well-adjusted individuals can do alone party is a worse guide than mere emotion. Hubris is out—and party is ancient history—when you venture into true Catholicism. The Catholic Church’s teaching always has an eye to the common good because charity is radical or it is a joke. There is no room for partisanship any more than for racism among living members of the Church. There is far too much at stake to indulge in such luxuries but perhaps especially at this hour when, if you would know the gravity of the situation, possessions and exorcisms are at a record high.
      l|   By way of landing this thing, fear not; pray always. Don’t be less political; be more than political. The Church does not exact nor does she recommend uniformity of thought or feeling, only of Faith. This is because common sense clamors for a subsidiarity that skirts the edge of anarchy. Be free in the Truth.

Join the Why ROMAnce? Facebook Group and become an accessory to restoring ROMAnce to Catholicism.

A.M.D.G.


[1] Synonyms include Hebraism, Hebrew, Israelite, Judahite, Judaism, Judean, Levite, Pharisee, rabbi, Sadducee, Semite, and Yid (and “they who wield the weapons of mass-distraction”).
[3] Excepting baseball and bluegrass. I’m talking about Naziism, Zionism, the Taliban, K.G.B., C.I.A. and M.I.6.
[4] The Late President John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
[5] These are analogous to what Scripture holds about the earth’s age. According to the Egyptians the first age was perfection, the second a fall, the third a redemption and the fourth was a restoration.

Friday, October 29, 2010

Chapter 5. “God’s First Love”

J.M.J.

If the web has taken away
Your ability attention to pay
You need not worry nor have fear;
We’re also on YouTube: just click here.

Note: To view this blog aright click “CTRL +” (to zoom in) and “CTRL –” (to zoom out).

Why  ROMAnce?
Only the common man is equipped to perceive the immense pleasure of orthodoxy.
Chapter  5
“God’s  First  Love”
Still hazy on how Catholics should view Jews[1]? Drift no longer.
arental advisory: explicit divine content. Perennial Catholic teaching without the usual politically correct Newspeak. Are you man enough?!
by J. P. F. McGuire
    a|   Most catholics, due to the same apparent amnesia that plagues them in all the foregoing topics, don’t seem to have the first notion on how to deal with the so-called “Jews,” which comes mainly as a consequence of the Catholic leadership of our age, though divinely appointed to be just that, not acting as a particularly reliable guide of late as compared with, say, the Gospels, Apostles, Pauline Epistles, Fathers, Doctors, past Popes and Saints[2]. But since, at any rate, these sources of Sacred Tradition seem unanimous[3] on the matter at hand plus carry the weight of both papal and conciliar approval the speech habits and human sensibilities of two recent colleague popes[4], sometimes unsettlingly lavish in their praise of lifestyles that do not lead to salvation, shouldn’t necessarily be an obstacle for a laity who I must assume (a) can read (or at least hear) and (b) sincerely seeks clarification on matters of Christian salvific import.
    b|   The question is most commonly couched, on the one hand, in such words as Are we to embrace or somehow silently coexist with the Jews as our elder brothers[5] whose standing with God we daren’t challenge on the sole basis of “seniority” (and maybe also clout)? On the other hand Are we to boldly condemn them as the professed apostates and deicides[6] they are as the first Christians did? But these questions are pretty much smokescreens compared with the burning question behind them both: Do the Jews still carry God’s promise to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob or don’t they? Firstly every Catholic, if he is to be thus termed, had better be crystal-clear that there is nothing Judaism, Paganism or anything outside Catholicism offers, provided it be of God, that Catholicism (universal) withholds.
    c|   Disclaimer #1. Catholicism opposes all racial supremacism and preference as do I. Catholicism, or at any rate, Pre-Second-Vatican-Council Catholicism, was not the impetus behind Naziism or Communism and had no sympathies or direct ties therewith even though Protestantism and especially “Evangelicalism” (Quietism) and Russian “Orthodoxy” played the enabler rather well[7] as long as it behooved them. Moreover it seems, given the Third Reich’s policies[8], that the (Pre-Conciliar) Catholic Church proved quite the bane[9] to the Fuhrer’s global goals. As to Naziism and Communism’s underpinnings it tended to be men who fraternized with unconverted Jews and Masons as did Martin Luther, Carl Gustav Jung[10] and Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche who let this rather Semitically inspired[11] affinity for confusing religious, cultural and racial identity influence their thoughts and, in turn, most heavily influenced the Neopagan German Volk Movement which, in all fairness, was no more “Antisemitic”[12] than the average Jew is “Antigentilic” or “Antiaryan” Adolf Hitler is known to be of Jewish descent as are Karl Heinrich Marx, Sigmund Schlomo Freud, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin and Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin. Not a one of these eight men had any tolerance for traditional or orthodox Catholic teaching—much to the contrary—and if the historical record is to be believed it was just such Jewish, Jew-friendly, Anticatholic and antidox men as these who seeded and oversaw the development of the worst aspects of German and Russian nationalist[13] ideas such as social Darwinist eugenics.
   d|   So let’s start by tackling the last question: Do the Jews still carry God’s promise to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob or don’t they? We ask this bearing in mind that, at the instigation of their anointed leaders, they in unison demanded Jesus’s crucifixion. But let’s make it even more general so it reads: Can an individual or a people do something to break a covenant with God? Some marginally Christian quacks—Calvinists[14] being the most infamous case—think, or at any rate preach, that God’s elections and covenants are inescapable, that there is nothing we can do to get out of them try as we may. They Protest that you can’t wiggle out of God’s covenants no matter what you do even though neither the New Testament nor the Old endorses this cavalier or disincarnational view[15]. Also because they buy into “predestination” in the absolutized sense Calvin preached, they would say the Jews were obliged to crucify Jesus so the Gentiles could have a crack at Him. This is another very boldfaced, very Zionist lie because Jesus came from day one as man’s universal Savior, nor is there anything to indicate that Jesus would have contented Himself to save just the Jews in the event that these accepted Him. What the Father willed and in fact did occur was that “salvation comes from the Jews”[16] and all the men sent[17] to preach to the “Nations”[18] were Jews. So to say the Jews had to do evil[19] in order that the Gentiles might receive Jesus runs completely contrary to what we know. Further, to say or imply that the end justifies the means, one may as well just admit to being a Gnostic and say that Jesus commanded Judas, against Judas’s will, to betray Jesus and that, all in all, God is a monster. This mechanical predestination is, always was, a profoundly preposterous sentiment and generally quacky theological position.
    e|   Disclaimer #2. Grace is a reality. It is true that everything good, covenants included, starts with God’s initiative[20]. For instance St. Paul explains the Roman Catholics (using the term advisedly) that “Christ died for us while we were still sinners”[21]. Moreover God is certainly faithful and on his end won’t break a covenant. But it seems pretty clear in both Old and New Testaments that a person and a people can exchange God’s blessing for their own curse, sometimes just for a time as with the many exiles and sometimes for all eternity. King Saul for instance: who could have seen that coming? Or Yahweh giving Israel “divorce papers”?[22] Yet my appeal is ever to common sense.
     f|   Disclaimer #3. Earthly or heavenly Jerusalem: take your pick. United States foreign policy has made its choice, but I again reiterate that we Catholics are essentially citizens neither of the United States nor of the Earthly Jerusalem but of the Heavenly Jerusalem. This is definitely an either/or proposition. Or was it in vain that Jesus told his disciples to stop marveling at the Temple? I know we in the United States, this Puritan Empire, have all been brainwashed with Calvinist and Zionist ideas. But “[t]ake and read” as the Angel said to St. Augustine. Read the Gospels, Apostles, Pauline Epistles, Fathers, Doctors, Popes and Saints, the whole of Church Patrimony, again but for the first time without the nagging Hebrew Nationalism that you’ve been told through much innuendo is somehow part of Christianity. Racism is not part of Christianity. If you tell yourself, as some have, that in saying this I’m “Antisemitic,” know that I don’t begrudge you. I’ve accepted that no one tells the truth about the Gospel today without receiving that and other labels as badges of honor as Mel Gibson did simply for making a movie about what Jesus suffered for you and me. I still invite you not to do a reverse of St. Paul’s conversion. I invite you to do a search on the word “Jew” in the Gospels, Apostles, Pauline Epistles, Fathers, Doctors, past Popes and Saints. I think your eyes will be opened if they haven’t yet been sewn shut.
    g|   One crucial factor in the earthbound saints’ perseverance in orthodoxy is to keep the habit of shunning novelty. “Yahweh, my heart has no lofty ambitions, / my eyes do not look too high”[23]. St. Thomas Aquinas[24], who observed, “Change for its own sake is bad” also said that “[t]he simplest answer is usually the correct answer.” This dude knew what he was talking about. Curiosity and needless complexity are in all cases the first steps toward sorcery. Persons and peoples that habitually embrace fashions are inviting decline and enslavement. In the Age of Christendom people got this right away. They had the prerational, instinctive sense to trust to kin, coreligionists and later countrymen who had it in their best interest to be honorable toward them. But honor has no meaning today. We still have that latent sense but it’s been covered by much ideological gobbledygook. Part of this issue, no doubt, is that we’ve allowed distance to be put between ourselves and the land, which is why we no longer see fairies and think a “fairy” is a homosexual. If our culture hasn’t died it is comatose. As I’ve stated there is no legitimate reason for a Catholic to refer to Church-era Neojudaism any more than to Church-era Neopaganism. Again it’s the principle of never committing the blasphemy of placing the highest good under the second-highest good and the idea that Catholicism is nothing less than a whole (holy) life. We learn much from the Old Testament and from several “Pagans” of the ancient world. But with those who come after Christ we must, if we value our souls, base the amount of time we spend on them on where they stand with relation to Christ and his Church.
    h|   The Evil One and the Masons who serve him would like nothing better than to scatter Jesus’s fold: a few into Judaism, a few others into Protestantism, Druidism, Rastafarianism, Reiki, Yoga, Voodoo, Wicca, Scientology, Mormonism, Islam, Bahá'í, Unitarianism, Universalism, the Moonies, Gnosticism, Theosophy, Masonry, Buddhism, Hinduism, the Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Seventh Day Adventists, Spiritualism, Pentecostalism, Calvinism, and why not Satanism—can’t you see what’s happening here? It’s anything to pique your curiosity just so long as it won’t fill your deepest need and it gives the devil an in so he can scatter Jesus’s flock. St. Augustine, who at one time had probably belonged to several of the groups I’ve listed, said, “You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you.” If you come to the place St. Augustine and St. Paul came to, whatever your past flirtings, you will have such peace and joy you won’t believe it.
      i|   What the devil doesn’t want you to know is that he’ll offer any color on the spectrum provided it isn’t the whole (holy) spectrum merged into the pure white light of Truth. He can stand everything except holiness, wholeness, universalism, Christendom. “Once the hand is laid on the plow, no one who looks back is fit for the kingdom of God”[25]. Jesus, being Yahweh’s Son, is understandably exacting and jealous. It “runs in the Family.” Remember the manna in the desert? God wants us to think about today only, looking back at his having freed us from slavery, looking forward to heaven. If you’re wondering why you’re not living right it would have to be because you’re not thinking this way, simply. God will save the simple and humble, and the rest will burn either temporarily or permanently. Thanks to Jesus salvation is for all, but for no man on his own terms. We ought to entrust the Jews to Jesus and Mary, not tell them that it’s okay in hopes of appeasing them. Maria Valtorta wrote that, when asked what was the meaning of the apostles’ abandonment of Jesus, the Master replied to them that it was because they were Jewish men and to get rid of their pride so they would be of use to his purpose. This is solely to illustrate God’s determination to simplify and mold those He would sanctify and use. All peoples have their pet vices, and the Jews are no exception whatever wild-eyed narrative you may have been sold on. We all have the sickness, as my mentor who hates all peoples equally[26] would say. This is common sense. This is how Christians have to think if the rubber is to meet the road for us as it did for the Evangelists, Apostles, St. Paul, Fathers, Doctors, past Popes and Saints. If you want elaborate, complex jibber-jabber of so-called “Enlightenment” there is the Occult for that, and there’s the door, and don’t forget to punch out. If you want Salvation there is the Church for that. Only make up your mind already, for, really, “you do not know either the day or the hour”[27].

Join the Why ROMAnce? Facebook Group and become an accessory to restoring ROMAnce to Catholicism.

A.M.D.G.


[1] Synonyms include Hebraism, Hebrew, Israelite, Judahite, Judaism, Judean, Levite, Pharisee, rabbi, Sadducee, Semite, and Yid (and “they who wield the weapons of mass-distraction”).
[2] Certain pontiffs today stop just short of labeling such sources “Antisemitic.” These include: Our Lord Jesus Christ; Sts. Paul the Apostle, John the Apostle, Thomas Aquinas, Augustine of Hippo, Cyprian of Carthage, Agobard, John Chrysostom, Jerome, Gregory of Nyssa, Basil the Great, Padre Pio of Pietrelcina, Alphonsus Maria Liguori, Ambrose, Felix of Toledo and Amphilocius of Iconium; Bl. Bernardine of Feltre; Popes Sts. Leo the Great, Sylvester I, Pius V; Popes Gregory IX, Innocent III, Clement VIII, Eugene IV, Alexander III, Benedict XIV, and Gregory VII; the Council of Elvira.
[3] The Saints are unanimous that the Judaizers and all who deemed the Judaism that rejected Jesus to have any redeeming value in any sense were dead wrong, that Jesus offers all men everything, and we have no need to have recourse to the Talmud or to Zionism; both are spiritually and temporally given over to corruption, bankruptcy, obsoleteness and death.
[4] “This too shall pass” (source not found).
[5] No reference to “Big Brother” (a character in George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four) intended.
[6] Added to these crimes they have been known throughout history to burn children (in Church history they have often been Christian babies) to Moloch. (Holocaust means “burnt offering” and not “gas chamber,” whatever the Zionists would have you think.) Hans Gross, revered inventor of the crime lab, executed extensive investigations into this ongoing Jewish crime against humanity as have countless noble magistrates down through history.
[7] This makes you wonder what could motivate some people to try to use the Second Vatican Council to make the Church more Protestant…
[8] This is best exemplified in the fact that Nazi concentration camps routinely housed members of the Catholic clergy but not of the Lutheran or other Protestant clergy.
[9] The Assisi Underground: The Priests Who Rescued Jews details the miraculous suppression of 300 Jews in the Town of Assisi and, though out of print, is available in hardcover through Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Assisi-Underground-Priests-Rescued-Jews/dp/081282315X.
[10] Jung was a Mason. Let Jung stand as one clue as to why I stipulate that “pre-Second-Vatican-Council” Catholicism, at any rate, did not endorse Nazi ideas: many Modernist Catholics today embrace him and his psychoanalysis as their salvation. The British Foreign Office (more than likely at the behest of some Bank of England C.E.O.) wanted Carl Gustav Jung tried at Nuremberg for “Nazi pseudoscience,” an indication that, as I know to be the case, Jung’s career as a scientist was, at best, dubious.
[11] The Semitic peoples include Jews and Arabs. (That is why it is preposterous to call an orthodox Muslim “Antisemitic.”)
[12] In the biasedly named “Jewish Holocaust,” while both Jews and Soviet prisoners of war peopled the Nazi concentration camps by the millions, these camps also housed considerable numbers of Roma (or Gypsies), Poles, left of center political prisoners, sodomites, cripples, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Catholic clergy, Eastern European intellectuals, Masons (being known Occult practitioners) and others including common criminals. Besides, if Hitler was truly “Antisemitic,” where were all the Arabs imprisoned? He had the Arabs fighting with him against the Jews in the Holy Land and vicinity! Not very “Antisemitic” since Arabs are just as Semitic as Jews.
[13] I.e. Nazi.
[14] This Calvinist position of absolutized predestination provides us with a clue as to why today’s Evangelicals are such avid Zionists and even coined the term “Judeo-Christian” as in “Judeo-Christian values.”
[15] Just to be clear: no true prophet or apostle would, could nor has ever said that we cannot possibly do anything to break faith with God. It’s the purest theological quackery.
[16] John 4:22b (Jerusalem Bible).
[17] Literally sent ones.
[18] Meaning “the Gentile Nations.”
[19] Which at least admits that they did evil, so we’re halfway there.
[20] Or “actual grace” as Western Catholics term it.
[21] Romans 5:8b (Jerusalem Bible).
[22] “ ‘[Judah] also saw that I had repudiated disloyal Israel for all her adulteries and given her her divorce papers. Her faithless sister Judah, however, was not afraid: she too went and played the whore’ ”  (Jeremiah 3:8 [Jerusalem Bible]).
[23] Psalm 131:1 (Jerusalem Bible).
[24] Hailed by G. K. Chesterton as “The Philosopher of Common Sense.” Speaking of G. K. Chesterton, I used to be afraid when someone started making too much sense that maybe that person was an “Antisemite,” not really knowing what the word meant. This happened with G. K. Chesterton. One day I was so pleased with how much sense he made I suddenly checked myself like a good United States Calvinist Catholic and said, Wait—he’s probably an Antisemite. That dang fly that for some strange reason is always in the most fragrant ointment! I don’t think that fear was ever entirely allayed when I discovered he did indeed advocate gently ousting the Jews from England. But gradually I learned what this disproportionately influential minority had done to England and was doing to the United States through the banks (Federal Reserve) and the media (Hollywood) to a point where, no matter what happens with the government, somehow controlling the currency and the mass-information trumps that.
[25] Luke 9:62 (Jerusalem Bible).
[26] Which also means loving all peoples equally.
[27] Matthew 25:13b (Jerusalem Bible).